Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 959595 robbery of falsehood, refusal to make false allegations, nor his name appeared in the FIR, but he was later arrested in another case after a confrontation with the police. And the complainant identified the accused along with the prosecutor's witness who was the robber who robbed the accused. He voluntarily turned the police over to his house and presented the missing mobile counsel to the complainant and Was prepared on the occasion in the presence of the prosecution witness, there was no enmity between the complainant and the accused, therefore, There was no question of the accused being lied to, the High Court found that mobile phone snatching was growing rapidly in society and people were being deprived of their valuables at gunpoint, hence, the accused at the present stage. Approval of a bail will be similar to the encouragement of a crime by which the accused's bail application is dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
