Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY

Article 199 Constitution Petition for the quota of recruitment policy for the children of retired and civil servants serving civil service and Inspector General of Police Disciplinary Order did not set the candidate's choice, which itself It was revealed that there will be seats. The vacancies available are allotted for quotas according to government policy, but the Standing Order was not specific in selecting the employees' children under such special seats under the Standing Order provided the candidate only met the criteria for relief relief. Fulfill Standing order can be considered as a sword of discrimination in the standing order, not explaining and explaining the way a candidate is selected. The policy has to ensure justice to those living under one umbrella in this manner and manner so that no one can come forward with its request. High Court directs discriminatory officials to chalk out procedures for selection of candidates appointed under quota of employees

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• SIKANDAR v. State 2013 MLD 1261
• NAJAMUDDIN ZIA v. Mst. ASMA QAMAR 2013 CLD 1263
• Syed MOHSIN SHAH v. Mst. MOMMAL AFTAB 2013 MLD 1269
• Syed MUHAMMAD FURQAN v. State 2013 CLD 1273
• JUMAN SOLANGI v. State 2013 YLR 1275
• WAQAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1279
• SULTAN-UL-ARFEEN v. DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2013 CLD 1280
• MUHAMMAD RASHID v. State 2013 MLD 1282

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

online advocate from Hangu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes