Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34, one morning, the joint intention to guarantee, the accused for not conducting the identification parade in recording the witnesses' statement of further investigation He killed his own husband / wife and according to the prosecution case he committed the crime by committing an extra-judicial confession before the police could not name the accused in the FIR. The defendant, who was registered after a delay of four days, was involved in the present case on the basis of the complainant's further statement, which was made 14 days after the registration of the FLRI witness who allegedly found the body of the accused. Was seen throwing. Police said 23 days after the incident, the suspect was the sister of the complainant and was known to indicate, but despite the fact that more Statemen delayed filing an FIR, the complainant's record was filed. And mediation and consultation were considered when recording more of the complainant, while additional prosecution of the accused before the police was yet to be proved in the case; the location of the incident was not identified by the accused during the investigation. It is reported that the investigating officer had already visited the place before the suspect was examined. The parade was not performed. The accused was the mother of a breastfeeding baby aged 1 year / 2 years. One of the further investigations into the matter was that the accused was allowed to bail \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
