Section 5, Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Recovery of the Dover amount, Dismissing the appeal on the basis of the appellate court's limitation, the appellate court's decision was based on the merit on the basis that the wife (defendant) The trial court's appeal was filed against the trial court's order by the affected suit spouse (applicant), in order to recover the sinking amount. She was claimed by the husband that she had signed the marriage contract to facilitate revenge on her husband. That he was trapped for receiving money from his wife, and that the marriage was not done properly, because soon after the marriage contract was signed, he left the country with a valid decision of the appellate court to a certain extent. The sole point was based on discrimination and was not addressed precisely, therefore, the husband was barred by the appellate court's decision to limit the spouse's broad claim to competence and trial. Pleaded to challenge the court's decision but did not say anything but the words related to the appellate court's decision were excluded because of the limitation, Appellate Court decision in ysy situation was unconstitutional and it was decided, therefore, agree with the results of the petition was dismissed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
