Find a Lawyer

WAQAS ALI versus STATE

Attempts to hurt sections 382B, 408 and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324 and 337L (1), murder and other suppression, he has been sentenced to full imprisonment but he has been detained. I've been taken The only reason for the non-payment of the payroll by the accused in jail was that his previous trial was treated as a prison for non-payment of damages. The accused committed a felony and a barbaric act, and the obligation to pay the damages will be retained and the relevant amount is to be recovered in a manner provided under the law. The accused is paid from the Zakat Fund or aid from Baital or NGOs. Which may consider and decide its application in accordance with relevant laws and procedures. The High Court may also release the accused on the charge of directing the jail authorities or any other accused on the same amount of bail / bail as he had already appealed to Nederogan for his conviction. Was dealt with accordingly

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• GULSHER v. State 2013 YLR 298
• ABDUL HAMEED PANHWAR v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 300
• DUTY FREE SHOPS LIMITED v. ISHAQ RASHEED 2013 PLC 302
• Mst. SHAMEEM v. State 2013 YLR 305
• DUTY FREE SHOPS LIMITED v. IRSHAD BUTT 2013 PLC 313
• SHAH MUHAMMAD v. Malik SOHAIL KHAN 2013 MLD 314
• MARI GAS COMPANY LTD. Through Arshad Iqbal v. BYCO PETROLEUM PAKISTAN LTD. 2013 PLD 314
• Mrs. NAJMA VASEEM ADENWALLA v. Mrs. ABIDA JAWED 2013 CLC 316

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

top advocates from Muzaffargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes