MUHAMMAD YASIN versus STATE
Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Steel Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6 and 9 (c) Guarantees, State Attorney's Grant, Despite stating that there is a good case for the culprits and this matter is a further investigation, Suggested that the accused should withdraw. A new petition should be filed before the trial court regarding the bail application and the qualification. The state lawyer's proposal in this regard would be stringent because he was instructed to withdraw the bail application on a technical basis, when the defendant's case was better on merit. The allegedly recovered chars were sent to KGG Chemical Examiner because the sample suspect was not driving the vehicle from which the undercover chassis was recovered and no driver's license was recovered from the suspect while he was standing at a bus stop. And he was arrested. The accused was falsely involved in the case on an almost identical basis as the co-accused, who were alleged by the High Court, were acquitted of bail, in which case they were entitled to bail on the principle of consistency. The suspect was released on bail, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from FR Peshawar lawyer