Find a Lawyer

ZARAR ALI versus STATE

Sections 23 and 430 Unlawful Advantage Irrigation work was not required to prove the original damage to the wrongdoer by injury or incorrectly turning water where there was nothing available to show that the complainant There was no legal right to the water withheld by the accused, the complainant's loss was not wrong and the offense of misconduct was not established under the law it was necessary to prove that any person who suffered or was harmed It was not necessary that such property should be harmed or harmed by the property owner. In the present case the complainant or his uncle is not the owner of the underground water course, not in the definition of any person damaged where the complainant had no legal right to the damaged case, any loss to the accused Cannot be convicted of. However, he did not complain of any damage to the complainant by the original owner of the water course who otherwise had no legal right to cross the water, if any, to provide for Section 430, PPC. Could not attract The prosecution, under the circumstances, failed to prove the offense under section 303030, the accused was sentenced and sentenced to life imprisonment under trial, they were acquitted, acquitted. And was freely punished \ r \ n list of advocates from Punch lawyer