Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAN AFRIDI versus RETURNING OFFICER

Constitutions 67, 72 and 70 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Constitutional Petitioner and Vice-Chancellor Charges of Corruption and Corruption Charges Election Tribunal does not consider recounting cast votes to determine corruption and corruption petitions Was. , Collusion and overuse of authority and authority records show that the contestants, who applied for a revision of the order, did not participate in the counting of votes, and corruption and corruption allegations on the re-counting results. Has been proven and there is no hard and fast rule. Determine the parties' actions and errors in the electoral process The benefit of the doubt, therefore, can only be extended to the returning candidate's election tribunal, before the record, the re-counting statement was ignored, and the election request was deemed invalid. The verdict was dismissed. The Election Tribunal approved that, under the circumstances, it was bound to violate the law on the one hand, the High Court on the remand of the matter to the Election Tribunal, the votes of the respective polling stations obtained for all election candidates. For the re-enumeration, the results of the Office of the Moderator and the Deputy Registrar and then the successful candidates were announced according to the constitutional request. advocate from Wazirabad lawyer