MUHAMMAD YASIN versus III-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH
Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Declining the personal need of the landlord to the tenant The tenant's view was that the petition for removal of the landlord to the Supreme Court was dismissed, the present petition for removal. I was affected by the shock. Principles of fairness The facts of justification and the circumstances of the earlier eviction petition did not match the present because of the straightforward reason that the former was not rejected on the merits. The request was deleted, it will not go in the way. The landlord allowed the constitutional petition, in the circumstances, to file the latest case in the High Court in favor of personal use, set aside the judgment / order underneath both the courts and moved the case to the Rent Controller. The pass was remanded to provide further evidence. Each of the two parties must be recorded at the specified point within a specified period and then listen to the part to decide the request for eviction according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Yazman Mandi lawyer