Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI versus STATE

The definitions of Sections 302, 324, 353 and 354/34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 6 (2) (a), (7) and 7 evidence in this case had no motive for murder. The area was examined to prove the prosecution's case through credible and convincing evidence, the eyewitnesses were interesting witnesses and their purpose was not to rely on the account of the accused Ocular and to confess credible witnesses. They could not be relied upon to record the death sentence on irrefutable evidence; in the absence of clear and straightforward evidence when their evidence was not verified by an independent and reliable source, the prosecution's testimony recorded the testimony of the witnesses. Weightlifting was not done, for the accused and the co-accused, arrested D, the identities were not put in the parade, though they were presented to the magistrate for remand purpose during the interrogation. The police party was not in a position to identify the accused later in the incident when Section 154, C.R.P. When the complainant's statement was recorded under C, he mentioned the names of the accused involved in various robbery cases, but no record of the accused or the co-accused was present on the record. That he sustained a firearm injury at the hands of the accused for two reasons. It was not able to detect it. Second, none of the prosecution's witnesses appeared to support a litigation case to avoid injury to the injured, even though the testimony of the unverified police personnel could not be the basis of the evidence. The arrest of the suspect was extremely suspicious and a minor in these circumstances immigration advocate from Dudial lawyer