Find a Lawyer

PRECIOUS INDUSTRIAL PARK (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR AND DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Sections 24 and 10 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. XXXX, RR 1 and 2 on the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), sections 42 and 54 on su As well as the declaration and injunction prohibited, the CPC had, on the basis of section 10 (2) of the Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912, allowed the plaintiff to arrest the plaintiff on his own admission that the authorities re-occupied the land. Which shows that the plaintiff has filed a lawsuit. On the basis of mere speculation and speculation and no action has yet been taken by the authorities to resume the aforesaid land, as it appears to be based on speculation, speculation, and speculation, or speculation. Was based, no matter how strong, that could not be the basis for filing a case before the court, nor could the court entertain a case that was solely based on mere sight and speculation, not on record. Showed that the subsequent action based on the minutes of the Scrutiny Committee binds the author. Intended to take no action against the plaintiff. If there is no restriction or restriction on the powers of the Government, legal action should not be taken in the allotment of land, if in view of Section 24, Government Land Colonization (Punjab) if the process of allotment of land is gravely illegal. Are clear. The Act, 1912 did not constitute a good case in favor of the plaintiff, and neither would the plaintiff suffer irreparable harm, if the injunction was denied, the circumstances were denied to the engine. advocates from Jaranwala lawyer