ABDUL QAYYUM versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 397 398, 392 and 34 bail, the grant of further investigation did not appear in the FIR and the accused was not charged with snatching cash. To show any bank records where the prosecution witness claimed a refund of cash in his statement under Section 161, CR PC, the statements of the two witnesses contradict each other, yet it cannot be settled. Who was questioned by the co-accused, the matter is suspicious, further investigation is needed on the matter, the accused do not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497, CRPC accused A case was filed for approval, it was granted bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Bhimbar lawyer