MUHAMMAD RASHEED versus AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN
The Section 8 and 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the Section 4 Seniority and Promotion Appeal Service Tribunal Appellants who have attained postgraduate qualifications, were appointed to the Office of the Director Audit Defense Services, and on 14 August 1988 the Senior Auditor ( BS11). Respondents who were graduating as Senior Auditors were promoted as Senior Auditors (BS11), which was applied from 1-7 1987 or from the date of their promotion / appointment as Appellant Authority. Were upset by the order. The senior auditors' seniority list was retained and it was found that the appellant was properly placed under the respondents (Non-Graduate Senior Auditors) Department of Appeal filed by the appellant was rejected. Appeal filed before the service tribunal's correctness Appellant correctly submitted to the joint sanity that the list contained in the appeal would work to the detriment of his right to an elder whose appeal was accepted. Put Appellant in the Separate Seniority List for Direct Recruitment Senior Audit Authorities Was directed by s.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
