Find a Lawyer

MST. REHANA HAFIZ versus MST. SIKANDAR HAYAT BALOCH

OI, R10 and Section 151 Required Parties No Cause of Action The applicant sought to have his name removed from the lawsuit on the grounds that he had played a part in the plaintiff's case. The sale process was carried out in favor of and was picked up by the applicant. Whether the plaintiff had no cause for action against the applicant or against his property The property plaintiff received his share of the property and processed the document registered in favor of the applicant during the trial. I did not have the rights and interest of the plaintiff. There was no cause for property and proceedings against the property; the High Court dismissed the applicant's name from the defendant's row and the applicant's property was excluded from the claimant. immigration advocates contact from Shikarpur lawyer