Find a Lawyer

THE STATE THROUGH COLLECTOR versus SYED MASROORUN NABI

Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), appeal against section 417 victorious prosecution, failed to prove the basis of this case because no witness had stated in court that he was near the container. I saw someone in the yard. The relevant night, therefore, it was speculated that the suspects were banned in the container, it could not be proved that the presence of any of the accused was not disclosed in the adviser, while the names of the accused were mentioned in the FIR. had gone. They were shown present when the container was opened and a prohibition was recovered in their presence. Officials submitted that witnesses did not verify their own case, and the absence of customs officials in this case clearly shows that the investigation is partial and biased. Twelve hours without any justification and explanation, the trial court provided the exact and dependent reasons for the incident. The defendant's final verdict on the benefit of the doubt was based on reasonable definition of the evidence and he demanded not to interfere, however he was acquitted in the circumstances. famous high court advocate from Kamalia Musa lawyer