Find a Lawyer

HAJI ALIAS GHULAM NABI versus STATE

The testimony of section 302/34 was testimony filled with suspicion as the complainant and another who allegedly injured in the incident died before recording the testimony of the investigating officer in this case. He was not examined because at that time, the only evidence in the trial was evidence of the testimony of only one prosecutor, but his evidence could not be relied upon because his version was accompanied by police. Contrary to the factual position stated by the doctor in his medical legal report. In connection with both injuries, the defendant denied the statement of only one witness to the prosecution on the basis of evidence from the doctor; the trial court's decision to dismiss the trial was set aside, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt. lawer from fb area from Mastoi lawyer