AZAM KHAN versus STATE
Under the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 417 breach of trial, the Court of Appeal accepted the accused's plea under Section 265 of the CCPC, on the grounds that his will No authoritative material was on record for the counter-notification. The complainant / appellant was at liberty to file a private complaint; if in the future he was to have any credible and credible evidence against the accused then the question linking him to the commission of the crime was whether the accused complained. The alleged (third) wife of the abductor was abducted. Neither the complainant's two wives nor the complainant's third wife's mother said a word on this point. He stated that the complainant has a third wife, but even if it is assumed that the complainant has a third wife, no case will be established against the accused. The circumstances were later prepared by the complainant. The story did not inspire confidence. There is no exception to the trial court's order to acquit the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Khanqah Dogran lawyer