Find a Lawyer

SANAULLAH versus STATE

Sections 13, 14 and 18 of the Criminal Code (V 1898), Section 265H (2) Validating Evidence Not only did the prosecutor fail to prove his case beyond doubt, the evidence also showed that The accused was malicious and lied to easily, which the complainant had no legs to stand on, when the police party approached the owner of the house where the alleged prostitution was advertised. If it was going on, it wouldn't keep it. The door was open, while there were acts of prostitution, the FLR did not disclose that there was any illegal activity in the house. No charges were committed for committing adultery and they were not charged with preparing to commit a zina FIR. Disclosure of any situation that guarantees that the accused were preparing to commit adulteration charging accused under section 18 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979; The FIR was lodged under Article 13 and 14 of the Ordinance and even more provocative, or was not remotely suggested by any of the accused. , Or trying to sell to someone. The purpose of prostitution or that any one of them had hired someone or owned someone else with the intention that such person would be employed or prostitution or illegal sex acts Will be used for the purpose of In addition, the FIR did not disclose who he was the victim of the crime with which six mills law firms from Talhur lawyer