Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SULEMAN versus STATE

Section 7 J7 J & ense 33 of Crime for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (I VII of 1979 1979), Definition of Section 12 Benefits Of Suspicion No trace of violence was found on the victim's body nor any semen stain. Was examined and was examined the same day and no anal tears were discovered The Chemical Examiner's report also stated that the testes were not stained with semen. Tranquillizers discovered they had been infected by someone. The person was given, but his shalwar was bleeding, but Shalwar examined him. The Chemical Examiner did not disclose any blood stains after the prosecution cross examined the defense witness, but the documentary evidence contained by the defendants with the ocular evidence of the said defense witness was inconsistent, there was no reason to deny the defense witness. Was not because he was an unwanted person and was. The Medical Report and the Chemical Examiner's report, which was based on credible documentary evidence, went in favor of the accused, which was also not confessed by the lawyer for the State's interest among the parties in the case, which was CA, neither declined in the prosecution's case. Could, in these circumstances, have failed to establish his case against the accused, who was entitled to benefit from the doubt, an unspecified verdict was set aside and the accused. Ongoing, under circumstances \ r \ n when you need a advocate from Khewra lawyer