TANVEER AND BROTHERS, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 122 (5A) of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Sections 9 and 11 certifying the issuance of a notice to review the already completed assessment ignored that the matter had already been assessed. Was considered and re-considered in the light of this. Consideration of the possibility of obtaining better or maximum revenue through IAC / CIT inspection note at the stage of re-examination with the approval of the senior officers, or a feasibility review to review such assessment. The prerequisites for reviewing the full assessment by law were not fulfilled. By issuing a notice of false allegation without jurisdiction, contrary to the law, corruption and mismanagement would have the jurisdiction to investigate such a case, especially when the department failed to discredit the proposed action, There was a reason for repeated notices on the same issue. Misconduct and harassment suggest that the mismanagement Fed Ariel Tax Ombudsman recommends withdrawal of invalid notes and consolidate revenue to allow the full assessment to remain good.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
