Find a Lawyer

SHAHEEN COURIER SERVICES, PROPRIETOR AMIR ALI SHROFF, KARACHI versus TAXATION OFFICER (I.A.C.) RANGE-II/COMPANIES-I, KARACHI

Section 122 Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI 1979), Sections 66A, 59 (1), 24 (c), 24 (ff), 24 (fff), 52, 86 and 139 Circular No. 9 of CBR, dated 15 7 1998 CBR. Circular No. 14 of 1998, dated 9-10 Establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance in 1998 (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Amendment of Assessments by issuing a showcase notice to self-review on this basis No details of total receipts were received under section 24 (c), 24 (ff), 24 (ff), 52 and 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 for assessment and complete information under section 139. And the proposed action was not reported after seeking a statement. The basis for the issuance of a notice under section 122/66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was misunderstood by the audit. Section 24 (c), 24 (ff), 24 (ff) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, Proposed action under sections 52, 86 and 139. A copy of the proposal to the Additional Commissioner was to be sent to the Director of Taxation for withholding tax. Legal statements under Sections 139 to 143A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, including section 24, section 52 and section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 ( C) was considered compliant, there was no specific mechanism for verifying it. Details of the total receipts required under Sections 24 (ff) and (fff) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 except in the case of Self Assessment Scheme except where in the tax for the party-wise details of the receipt of the asset party. Get a discount. (FF) and 24 (FF) can only be verified under audit or under normal diagnostic procedures during the course of the investigation. The proceedings under section 122/66A may be initiated on the basis of the procedure proposed by the audit. In this matter attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sakardu lawyer