Find a Lawyer

NAZAR KHAN, CONTRACTOR, D.G. KHAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 62 and 143B constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 247 Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), section 2 (3) (i) (a) (b), 9 and 11 = Income tax Claim of Return Tax deduction for work done in the tribal area was claimed that assessment under Section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was completed in view of Article 247 of the Constitution Officer, but he issued a refund. And later the diagnostic record was transferred to the jurisdiction. The second region was completed in such a case without a review of the jurisdiction and no complete procedure. Rah's claim was not resolved after one year, and such facts would result in negligence, negligence, incompetence and inability to perform the duties. The establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, within the meaning of section 2 (3) (i) (a) (b) of 2000, gave legitimate reasons to the tax authorities to prove that the defendant had done wrong. The reason they failed to exclude the Federal Tax Ombudsman was to instruct Revenue-related tax authorities to conduct a thorough investigation to determine where the revenue was rising, and If any such situation has occurred in the tribal area, a refund will be made. ant Complainant, and if it was not born in the tribal area, then appropriate diagnosis should be made and issued immediately after completion of the assessment as required by law, any r \ n famous supreme court advocate from Sehwan lawyer