Find a Lawyer

MRS. FEHMEEDA B. RAZA QASURI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 8 and 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Promotion and Seniority Assessment Appellant, who was employed as Assistant Educational Advisor in BS18 from 1974 to Deputy Educational Advisor in BS18. The Central Selection Board meeting was considered for the first time in the Central Selection Board meeting on 29 April 1989, with a minor penalty of censorship and a minor reduction in time scale by one stage, and four in its AC. Negative remarks were recorded. , The 12 marks were deducted from the original quantification score. It was stated that the applicant's score was calculated at score 47 after the reduction of 12 marks while 60 silks were required against the required threshold for which the applicant was recommended for the applicant on 29 3 1989. Was. Following the development of the Deputy Educational Advisor BS-19 in this meeting, the meeting of the Central Educational Board was held on May 29, 1989, the second meeting was held on 1 8 1992, but again it was stated that the applicant's verification score. The number 12 was cut off, which allowed him to score 49, which was again found to be less than 60 points and the applicant was not considered for promotion. The third meeting of the Central Selection Board was held on 4 April 1996 and again stated that on the same basis of old minor fines, the number of appellant's certiorari was deducted from the number 12 and dismissed the four negative ACs and appellants from 1984 to 1987. had gone. In BS 19, which had effect from 12 12 2003 and appellant's seniority in BS 19, however, it was calculated from 16 12 2003 instead of the date when it should have been promoted with its juniors, So 12% divorce advocates from Okara lawyer