ARBAB ALI ZARDARI versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL/APPELLATE AUTHORITY NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND MOTORWAY POLICE
Section 3, 5, 6 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the removal of section 4 from the Service Appellant, who was appointed as a petrol officer (B14) in the National Highways and Motorway Police. He was later convicted of a major dismissal. For this reason, show the notice and be charged with inquiring that they are involved in corruption. The inquiry officer, who made the inquiry, submitted his report which found that the appellant had committed the misconduct as The allegations have been made in light of the departments. He said that notice was taken in the inquiry proceedings that notice was taken in the inquiry process that the report had sentenced him to be removed from the inquiry process, but did not mention it in the cause notice by the competent authority. The appellant's record was not provided with a copy of the complaint as alleged by Dee River, nor was the statements of witnesses available, only the evidence available on record was recorded by the Fine Collection Unit's contractor. The mandatory provisions provided by the authorities depend on the authorities not complying with them God was unshakable order was isolated and the appeal was more of a maintenance order may direct that department / official investigation should be completed within four months of receipt of the decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Khuiratta lawyer