RIAZ MUHAMMAD versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, INTELLIGENCE BUREAU (IB) HEADQUARTERS, ISLAMABAD
Appellants after section 3 (1) (b), 5 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 service discharge appeals after issuing a job and questioning them on unauthorized charges. Has been imposed on. For almost two years the absentee appellant, who was allowed a brief extension to complete the school year of his children overseas under his government, had to report for duty, but he did not do so if the appeal. If the applicant wants to receive voluntary retirement, his request should have been processed in accordance with the rules when he had reported duty in Pakistan, so the appellant could not request that some officers belonging to other ministries abroad. Did not return from his posting and was allowed to retire voluntarily Yep. Receiving voluntary retirement at the completion of 20 years of qualifying service was subject to the provisions of the Services (Rehabilitation) Act, but was not available to EG, a public servant. Because of the sensitivity of the work of the organization, which the Department of Inquiry pending was primarily concerned with questions of security and discipline in the country, its employees could not be allowed. With the exception that the office-related disciplinary appellant, who was knowingly present to himself, could not escape the consequences of his conduct. Cannot interfere with an unknown order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
