M UHAMMAD, IRSHAD versus COURT OF IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SOUTH, KARACHI
Section 499 of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), the rejection of section 392/34 bail application, which is guaranteed for the accused, submitted its lease document measuring 45 square yards, but the trial court granted bail in the plot discussed. The amount was Rs. 1,500,000, while the total bail amount given to the accused in all cases was Rs 900,000. The trial court did not give any reason for rejecting the applicant's trial documents, which were filed by the co-accused. The bail documents submitted were those related to the land. Which was much smaller than the area offered by the applicant, the trial court proceeded to discriminate as the trial court wanted to accept the applicant's / bail documents under the doctrine of consistency and by not doing so, Discrimination was committed. High court directs court to accept bail plea submitted by accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
