Find a Lawyer

SHAFIQUE TEXTILE MILLS LTD versus STATE

Article 2 (a) (b) (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Applicability of the Constitution Petition for the Rent Rent Ordinance 1979, the scope petitioner challenged the concurrent results of the courts under which it was considered It was not done in the premises. The Sindh factory was a similar factory to fall under the Ordinance 1979, under which both the courts had erred and hastened to decide the jurisdiction and the contents of the rental agreement show that The premises were abandoned for the purpose of warehousing and not to run a factory; if there was a factory set up then it was a matter of proof, after which the issue could be decided. It is said that both the decisions of the courts below were set aside and the case was forwarded to the rent controller with instructions to proceed. After issuing the jurisdiction, state its case and decision and decide the same after recording the evidence as per the law. online advocate from Harnai lawyer