KHALID ZAMAN KIYANI versus STATE
Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 109, 147, 148 and 149 bail were not present at the time of the defendant's grant incident and no specific role was assigned to the witness of the alleged crime. Connect to The defendant, who was the defendant, did not support the complainant's version, who did not even accuse the accused Prima, of plotting a murder trial against the accused, which was revealed by both witnesses 30 days after the incident. The fourth investigating officer, while no one in the first three investigations made any such disclosure, which led to the suspicion that they were witnesses after the prosecution, despite knowing the conspiracy, the police immediately recovered But the matter was not reported and kept the mother for thirty days. No explanation was available about the record, which was recorded after a delay of 30 days and a conspiracy. At the trial of the CE, while the testimony of the prosecution witnesses was not examined despite the presence of the complainant, it was not examined and the prosecution's other witnesses who were imprisoned could not be presented and examined. The accused has been in custody for the last 2 years. And 6 months without any progress in the trial and only the accused who filed the case for bail approval, was admitted to bail, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Goular Khel lawyer