PAK AMERICAN COMMERCIAL (PVT.) LTD versus HUMAYOUN LATIF
Section Civil Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 By way of its director dismissing the claim of the plaintiff from the plaintiff, he tried to declare to the effect that the plaintiff was the tenant of the defendant and his As a result, the plaintiff has been reviewed by the Company's Legal Property Director. The shop in question was not occupied at any time; the plaintiff's director of the company was aware of the implementation of the transfer of the tenancy rights by his father in favor of his brother and the transfer of the suit about five years. About five years after the registration of the registration was lated, it was filed with impeachment. After the unlawful delay, the plaintiff had no explanation for his brother and there was no privatization of the agreement between the parties, therefore, the plaintiff has no legal role to sustain the defendant's case. Was, the case filed by the plaintiff was not retained in law. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
