Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH KHAN versus STATE

The testimony of Sections 302 (b), 324 and 149 of the evidence was hostile between the parties and between the accused and the eyewitnesses, despite the fact that no independent witness was examined by the prosecution. A place in a densely populated area surrounded by shops. The evidence of the three alleged witnesses is inconsistent, after the completion of the FIR, the bodies of the bodies related to the incident were handed over to the complaining party, who supported the defendants' argument that under the FIR and Section 161 The statement was recorded on the PC when the TT pistol was presented by an accused with his license when he appeared at the police station for the purpose of surrendering himself, with trash poured on the identification of the accused. The other two firearms were recovered 13 days after the impact of the restoration, which was difficult to believe, collecting trash. The firearms were lying in the trash without notifying the victim, and the person recovered from the area was not a resident of the area from whom the recovery process was implemented. Had applied for. The trial court acquitted the accused, setting them free famous supreme court advocate from Kandiaro lawyer