Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAAL versus SESSIONS JUDGE, MULTAN

Section 561 An Explosive Code (XLV of 1860), the abduction of a section 65 B65 B FIR, the alleged abduction of a Muslim sui jury and the age of puberty, aged 22/23, for their marital life and future. The kidnapper has gained enough maturity and the majority to decide the question. Her husband, the accused wanted to accompany the applicant, but under the orders of the sessions court, she was illegally imprisoned in the premises against her wishes, which was her unlawful imprisonment. Was suspected of the truth of the alleged abduction of the couple. Nonetheless, the Tasadik spouse was ordered to be detained in the Darul Aman by the Marriage Order, which was dismissed by the Sessions Court and investigated by the investigating officer without any jurisdiction and arrested the accused on irrational grounds. Which had no legal or factual justification. The CTI had already rejected the story set up in the FIR before the applicant, his real brothers and mother, especially when Abdo was available for arrest, leaving the complainant's allegation that their His daughter has been abducted, there was no legal evidence on the allegations made in the FIR when the kidnapper made the first statement, the investigating officer and the area magistrate that he had not been abducted by the police registered a case and The accused arrested and exceeded his authority, apparently for some degree of consideration with regard to the record and proceeding with the law. Was a matter of abuse. Further, the complainant himself has filed the complaint before the High Court Investigation Agency. advocates from Taunsa sharif lawyer