Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

TARIQ MEHMOOD ANJAM versus ALLAH DITTA THROUGH MUKHTAR-E-AAM


Instead of submitting the Section 24 pre-emption suit to the trial court, instead of determining the amount on the IX that was submitted as the Z-SUM, one / third of the sale consideration within thirty days. Directed to submit the share, Wendy opined that the sale consideration is Rs 37. 50,000, whereas pre-emptor deposited one / third of the amount of Rs. 50, 000, Rs. Rs. 3/3, the trial court dismissed the case but the lower appellate court directed the pre-emptor to Zarim Shamim deposited Rs. 37,50,000 and remanded for the trial by law. Basically, the trial court was obliged to pass a valid order under section 24 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991. The lower appellate court correctly stated that the amount to be submitted to the trial court should be specified when the office reported that 1 / 3rd came to Rs. 12,50,000, the lower court appealed to the lower court. No error in law or fact was found in the order made.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Dhatmal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.