Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Appraisal of evidence On the record of the presence of witnesses, uncle and son present at the relevant time, it has been proved that there was no evil or hostility against the accused witnesses. In a false case, the son will never replace his father's murderer by an innocent person. Eyewitnesses provided a permanent, coherent, natural, and reliable writing of the incident, which was fully supported by medical evidence and confirmed the circumstances of the case. Still available at the time of the incident The suspect was known for prosecution witnesses. There was no question of the identity of the accused in the filing of the FIR, which was clearly explained by the complainant, otherwise the absence of delay in the previous enmity in filing the FIR does not matter. In this way, most prosecutors successfully proved the case against the accused, while at the site of the incident, armed with a deadly weapon, one time and shot the victim's head and face in the face of an innocent person. The victim, who revealed his intention, had also made brutal allegations of dishonesty against the female folk of the deceased. Did not justify the death sentence in any case. The conviction was upheld. famous supreme court advocate from Khanpur lawyer