IQBAL HUSSAIN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
A. VIII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 (1) Constitutional application damages, the recovery of the plaintiff's dismissal was a public servant and he initially defended on the basis of the gruesome proceedings with him. Ali had claimed recovery. The government was also prepared as a defendant, so the trial court, in accordance with Article 1212 (1) of the Constitution, dismissed the case, which was upheld by the lower appellate court, The accuracy suit did not present a dispute between the employer or the employee. In the original case no relief claim was made against the federal government and in any case the government was dismissed as a defendant in the case, the plaintiff would have the right to get relief, as per the law. Without the order of the lower appellate court was declared invalid, the trial filed by the plaintiff was considered pending in the trial court. According to the law, further proceedings were allowed to decide the case. Was given
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Noor kot lawyer
