Find a Lawyer

KHAN-MUHAMMAD versus FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION THROUGH SENIOR MEMBER, ISLAMABAD

Section 3 Punjab Land Reform Rules, 1972, R12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Impact of Land Restoration Respondents were the owners of the land in question and the Federal Land Commission held their holding within the roof of 8000 Production Index units. Pie. Applicants filed a review application as being a real estate tenant, which was allowed and the Federal Land Commission's order was reviewed but subsequently reinstated by the appellate authority, It is noteworthy that no decisive action was taken until 23 1990. The matter and no land was resumed, no opportunity arose for the provisions of the MLR 115 or the Land Reforms Act of 1977, the revision petition itself before the senior court for the cut off date of the Supreme Court order. It was filed ten years later. The Federal Land Commission was without full jurisdiction. The Chief Land Commissioner has observed that the applicants do not have a Luxury Standalone Oil Review application, which was filed by the Deputy Land Commissioner in respect of R12 (3) of the Punjab Land Reform Rules, 1972. The order was endorsed and ratified, under the R12 (3) of the Punjab Land Reform Rules 1972 (3). 30 197 At the end of 1975 and before the review order was approved, it ceased to be effective for more than 25 years, the High Court in exercising constitutional jurisdiction refused to interfere with the order passed by the Federal Land Commission. best law firms from Pirpai lawyer