Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Sections 498 (Code XLV of 1860), Sections 337 F (vi), F (ii), 337 L (ii), 337 H (ii) and 34 bail before arrest, while refusing to equip the accused with rifle. The complainant party along with other co-accused, along with his co-accused Armed Sota, were attacked and the prosecution witness suffered severe injuries that resulted in the fracture of the bone and removed the shoulder joint completely. Is covered under section 7F7F (vi), PPC. The suspect was found to be fully involved by the Investigation Officer, with a seven-year sentence, alleging that he was not involved in any kind of misconduct by the complainant because of false involvement in the case. This was the condition for the approval of the extraordinary discount. The pre-arrest FIR, though delayed by five days, said that the delay was made by the complainant but the arms were still being recovered from the accused but on record to contact the accused's commission. There was plenty of evidence. The accused's bail was granted pre-arrest bail if he was found guilty of the crime famous lower court advocate from Chicha watni lawyer