Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE


Section 497 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 18 Bail, three days delay in filing FIR was not adequately defined and the co-accused was declared innocent and this investigation It was found that the case against the accused was suspected and it was supported by the reasons that neither the accused nor the complainant's wife were found naked, filed under section 161. The woman's statement to the woman was not in accordance with the story contained in the CRPCFIR, cases such as a prior history of the accused's involvement were on record and the case will be filed in the near future. There was no possibility of a hearing. The suspect was admitted on bail, under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Kundina lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.