Find a Lawyer

STATE versus MUHAMMAD IMRAN

The testimony of Section 302 was reported to the police shortly after the police arrived in the hospital but nothing was in the record that the prosecution's witness was somehow related to the deceased and accused of being involved in the incident. There was no motive to expunge a liar against the accused. And he injured the casualties at the relevant time and place, but he pleaded that he did so under the exercise of his right to self-defense under Article 121 of the Law of Martyrdom, 1984. The petition was obliged to prove, but he did not merely refuse to appear in court under section 404040 (?), CCPC, but he also did not present any evidence to prove that The defendant's request for self-defense was heard during the trial, during which he was never taken at any stage. Investigation of the case under section 342, CR PC, the accused raised in his statement the defense action case was not kept with the prosecution witness in its interim examination. The case for defense proceedings by the accused was contentious, as well as contradictory, which he otherwise failed to prove to the prosecution that he had put the case against the accused to death in a public place. , He retained most of the 16. He was pronounced dead by an instant cause of injuries to various parts of his body with sharp weapons, but due to negligence for any reason, the trial court sentenced the accused to death. , And it was answered in the affirmative. tax advocates from Mehmood Kot lawyer