MASOOD SADIQ versus MST. SHAZIA
Section 36 and 43 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Article 5 Muslim Family Law Ordinance (VIII of 1961) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Reinstatement Allowance (Assessee) as a Family Under Section 36 of the Christian Divorce Act, 1869, the court granted temporary restitution (wives) and wives and minor children. The Family Court's order passed by the appellate court maintained that the wife's remarriage was abusively covered under the Christian Divorce Law. , 1869, but as far as the care of the underprivileged children was concerned with the decision of the proceedings, no special provision of this aspect of the case was justified. In the absence of any special provision to provide rehabilitation to minors, the provisions of the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964 would be in conflict with the provisions of the Christian Divorce Act 1869, which were not available in the West Pakistan FA Mill Courts. The Appellate Court, by default, found the wife and minor rehabilitation allowance in accordance with the provisions of Articles 36 and 43 of the Christian Divorce Act 1869, which made it illegal for Christians. The Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, found no illegal or jurisdictional error in the appellate court's decision, which was not open to any interference by the High Court; the application for the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction was excluded in the circumstances. Was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Fateh Jang lawyer