Find a Lawyer

STATE versus MUHAMMAD KHAN ALIAS MUHAMMAD BAKHSH ALIAS MUMMI

Sections 2?2 (b) and 7 337a (ii) of the FIR definition, which were regularly mentioned in the names of the accused persons with their role, were not registered with extraordinary delay medical evidence. Was not found to contradict the account of recovering the wounds. Injured prosecution witnesses and all eyewitnesses with deadly weapons have a close relationship with each other and with the victim, but only because the relationship is not enough to make them an interesting witness because the previous enmity. Not intended to be involved in illicit wills or false accusations, is present between the accused, the accused and the witnesses of the complaining party, the witness cannot be declared an interested witness in the circumstances as the complainant made his presence on the spot with his deceased husband. , Explaining the possibility of the presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident They can not be declared. The witness was severely injured late and his presence was confessed on the device by medical evidence. Both witnesses remained consistent in the time, place of the incident and the manner in which the incident occurred. The medical officer correctly noted the injured at the same location while examining the testimony of both the deceased and the injured prosecutor during their medical examination both witnesses witnessed the time, location and manner of the incident. I was persistent, the said witnesses were neither hateful of the accused nor had any reason to be falsely implicated in the case; The reason for their statement attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sahiwal lawyer