MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF
Section 13 Students not required to send and deliver publication notice notices, in the present case, were given by a lawyer in the presence of two witnesses, five by the registered core to prove the performance of the notice pool The testimony presented to the witnesses was also proved that the absence of notice would not eliminate the correct performance of the petition, in the presence of the two witnesses there was a condition for maintaining the pre-arrest claim but proof of the notice was not necessary. Two witnesses proved, proof of delivery of the notice was not required under Section 13 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 nor Islamic law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Tank lawyer