Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Appraisal of evidence Although the suspect was a very busy place at the scene of the incident, none of the witnesses to the palace were either referred or presented to the trial court. Eyewitnesses were residents of the village three or one distance away, or the ocular testimony in front of the location four km was against medical evidence, mutually destructive and complete with many material contradictions that were unable to be reconciled to the prosecution. None of the witnesses reported the matter to the police, although the police was only two steps away from the police station. After the incident was not registered at the police station, the case was filed that the story of the shooting was prepared on the spot as the recovery of the pistol was inconsistent with the accused on the occasion of the dispute as no crime was recovered from it. Spot and recovery witnesses were not residents of the area. The motive of the incident was not proved by anyone. Independent evidence The presence of witnesses on the spot was suspicious. Apparently, or suspected that if anyone could not form strong evidence. The accused had the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted. famous supreme court advocate from Buchay Key lawyer