Find a Lawyer

MADINA JUTE MILLS LTD versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Article 199 Constitution of the Constitution Application Retention Agreement Petitioner has previously provided, according to the specification and quantity mentioned in the contract within the stipulated date, the delivery of the 000 ba bales of the jacket bag paid to the first applicant and he is entitled to Rs. 48 per bag and the deducted amount on the basis that according to the purchase manual, the applicant firm had provided a price logical certificate and upon verification, it has been confirmed that the applicant firm has made a similar The bags were presented to another department at Rs 489 per bag by the applicant company. Works can not change the amount of the contract. The other department has entered into an agreement with the applicant firm, which has agreed that the applicant firm will provide Rs. 51 per bag in the meantime to the department as agreed by the rate. The contract with the other department was Rs 51 per bag, could not be maintained by the proper authorities at the rate of Rs 48,988 per bag by the authorities to direct the High Court for payment of the constitutional authority. The High Court directed the authorities to clear the balance of the balance as per the agreement between the parties. Application was allowed under law with the circumstances jobs for fresh advocates from Sanghar lawyer