Find a Lawyer

HUSSAIN SPINNING UNIT NO.2 versus AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF WAGES AND ANOTHER CONSTITUTIONAL

Article 15 of the Workers' Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Sections 3 and 19 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 payment of wages passed away due to a heart attack of employees, the petitioner's son moved two petitions. One under the Workers' Compensation Act, 1923, and the other under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, the employer filed a legal application stating that the deceased employee had resigned from the job, the employee and the employer had no relation to the deceased and the employer. Does not exist between The duties that perform the duties of the victim's supervised nature were not laborious and the request made by his son was not applicable whereby the claim of the victim's son was allowed and the employer was instructed. It was supposed to collect group insurance and other legal money. In the testimony, the victim's son stated in the evidence that the victim worked in the place of absentee workers and repaired the order machines and that the machines were handed over to the concerned workers after fixing the fault. The deceased had no right to rent and fire and since his basic wage was Rs 2645, the victim's son had such a fine without any contract / unauthorized, it can be safely said that the slain \ The laborer was \ the employer further claimed that the authority did not have the authority. Step by step son with two petitions under the same order running under two different laws and decide whether to pay for the commissioner's labor at the same time as well as the salary payment act, the conditions under the authority. Were also dealt with. Together with the two applications, labor laws were enacted to protect the interests of the workers. female advocates from Sambrial lawyer