Find a Lawyer

SUO MOTU COURT REFERENCE versus

Reports relating to the arrest of the accused under section 28 Pakistan Jail Rules, 1978, R235, have revealed that the reason for the delay in the hearing of detained detainees is mainly due to the absence of prosecution witnesses. There was a hearing. And at the time of the trial, the person in charge of the prisoner's absence could not be detained indefinitely and the doctrine of innocence was attached to it until his conviction. Unless the High Court has directed that the prisoner, on the day of his non-advancement hearing after March 31, 2007, be considered potentially detained without legal authority or unlawfully and accordingly a trial to deal with it. Courts were also instructed to submit a list of cases on a daily basis when the detained prisoners were not presented to the superintendent. Or was The Central Jail and the Special Jail were directed to submit quarterly reports, noting the reasons for the F hearing and the reasons for such non-production were not the sole reason for the delay in the irresponsible irresponsibility of the prisoners, but on several occasions witnesses The absence or the soft behavior of the parties or the courts contributed to this delay. property advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer