CHAUDHARY MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus MIRZA WAHID MUHAMMAD BAIG
Sections 190, 173 and 561 of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 380 and 511 after the accused have been fully involved in their evidence, dismissing orders to refuse to order the accused to complain. The petition was moved before the trial court for inclusion in the case. The case was ongoing, but was excluded because the police did not join him as the accused and if the complainant was not satisfied with the investigation report, he should file a complaint directly. The order against the aforementioned order filed by the user was removed by session. The court cited justification for the transfer of the application made by the trial court and the sessions court on the grounds that it did not include the applicants as the accused were not lawful in the courts. Not bound, could be serious. Even a negative police report was taken and the person receiving the police exemption could be included as an accused if he was found, the first person on the commission, evidence of the crime and his execution. Was either not supported or for no apparent reason. Advising the complainant to file a complaint directly against such person will only have the effect of widening and prolonging litigation in which no time limit was set for prosecution against the person involved. For the purpose of initiating the trial of an individual, any stage may be included as an accused in court and material collected by the investigating agency or presented before the court and
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
