Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM SHAH versus STATE

Section 12 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Definition of Evidence, At the age of 15/16, Victim's reduction clearly stated in court that he was abducted, 5/6 He was imprisoned for days and subjected to misconduct. The accused, along with the co-accused, said that the two independent witnesses had further confirmed the evidence of the victim, that, despite a lengthy examination of the prosecution's witnesses, no specific contradiction can be made in the record to create doubt. The investigation was badly done. As the investigating officer, neither the car allegedly used for the commission of the crime was found nor the place where the victim was kept for 5/6 days and he was mistreated by the accused, But even so, it has been said that the prosecution completely proved the commission of the crime. Ordinance of Section 12 (Enforcement Hood) of the offense of adultery, 1979 Hood (Ordinance) of the accused under section 12 of the Zina crime, ordinance, 1979, according to law, Victim, who was the star witness in this case, stated that the accused During the period of 5/6 days, she committed adultery with her, who was an eighth student. At the time of the incident, the class was fully corroborated by medical evidence, without a doubt that he had not given his final opinion on the sodomy commission with the victim, and was pending until the report of the Chemical Examiner. Which was not available, but was not known in the prosecution's case as a local inspection of the victims by the doctor; it was believed to have been penetrated, which was an offense under section 77, 77 Enough to prove it, PP advocate from Chawinda lawyer