MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE
Section 10 (3) Definition of evidence Punishment, lack of prosecution proved his case beyond the shadow of doubt against the accused through ocular evidence, the doctor's evidence which examined the victim on the day of the incident and It also presented a positive report. Under Section 10 (3) of the Chemical Inspectorate and the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement Hoodood) Ordinance, 1979, the evidence of the culprit was in accordance with the law and did not demand a sentence of ten years imprisonment for any offense. However, through the trial court against the accused, consideration needs to be given that the trial court did not take into account the fact that the accused was a juvenile at the time of the incident and had no prior criminal history if the accused was less than the convicted sentence. If done, the end of justice will be done. Ten years \ RI to five years \ RI reduced from 10 years to five years \ RI accordingly \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Tarbela lawyer
