Against Section 12 (2) of the fraud and misrepresentation in the transaction, the applicant asserts that the property in the dispute was purchased from his original allottee. The messenger respecting this transaction was periodically executed and registered. In the dispute the property was never transferred to the property or to the defendant's lawyer. On the strength of the attorney's statement, the court issued a statement stating that the property in dispute was the property of the plaintiff company, which gave the attorney the power of attorney and is under the authority of the prosecuting attorney. The lawyer was canceled by registered cancellation The petitioners alleged that such declaration was obtained by the lawyer through fraud and misrepresentation in the court in which the property was declared unacceptable to the extent of the declaration. Given that the property was the assets of the respondents, under the plea of the lawyer's bald statement, could not be retained and was able to return the attorney was established to make a false representation before the court that he was the power of the attorney. On the other hand, the owner of the property had to suppress the fact that before that his lawyer had the authority Was disconnected. Its statement was filed in a court petition under Section 12 (2), CPC was allowed and will be upheld The wrongdoer in the dispute was excluded from the respondents' assets and property in dispute. Order was excluded to the extent of declaration against.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
