MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. THROUGH ATTORNEY versus SAFDAR ALI MEMON
Section 25A & 37 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (B) dismissed from service Appellant respondent / employee dismissed from this charge. He was involved. Certain instances of misappropriation of employer bank funds in the marginal margin accounts and mis-crediting of various account holders were also reported, the employee filed a complaint against his employment order against dismissal. Was ordered to dismiss the employee, and was ordered to reinstate the service with immediate effect. The temporary complaint against the respondents / employee was filed by the employee before the bank officials and he allegedly deposited the entire amount. In order to protect himself from the criminal consequences of this case, the officers and his officers are also being accused of negligence on their employee. As a bank employee and the bank's entire business operates on the trust that consumers place on a particular bank because of the credibility and integrity of their staff, it would not be appropriate for an officer to serve in the bank for rehabilitation. Be done The bank was found guilty of embezzlement in the bank management's internal inquiry, which found the employee guilty of allegations leveled against him by an internal investigation, forcing such an employee not to withdraw and run the risk. Should. Some Big Things Although some technical points were in the law in favor of employees, the merits of the cases should be on merit and not on techniques. Separate Impressive Order Approved by Labor Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
